Judge Orders Deputy to Stun Defendant [Caught on Tape]
A former Maryland judge Thursday was sentenced to a year’s probation for ordering a Charles County sheriff’s deputy to administer an electrical shock to a defendant in his courtroom.
Robert C. Nalley, a former Circuit Court judge in Charles County, had pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of violating the civil rights of the defendant, Delvon L. King, as King was about to be tried on a gun charge in 2014.
King, 27, said in court that Nalley “tortured” him and deprived him of a fair trial. Nalley had a deputy shock King, who was representing himself, as he made what he believed was a legal argument during jury selection on July 23, 2014. King dropped to the ground when a 50,000-volt shock was administered through a Stun-Cuff attached to an ankle.
After paramedics determined that King was not seriously injured, Nalley continued jury selection. On Thursday, King told U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Connelly that he was disoriented and fearful after being shocked and was not able to defend himself to the best of his ability.
During the sentencing hearing, federal prosecutors played a videotape of the incident and, separately, an audiotape. In the audiotape, King and Nalley briefly talk about what the judge should call the defendant, who considers himself a “sovereign citizen” and not subject to the government’s laws. They agree on a name, and as Nalley talks about the jury selection process, the defendant speaks over him, making what he believes is a legal point.
Nalley, his voice agitated, says, “Stop. Stop.” Then he says: “Mr. Sheriff, do it. Use it.”
King screams three times.
The videotape shows King calmly spread about a dozen stacks of paper on the defense table. Nalley takes the bench. Later, King drops to the ground, falling on his right side.
The incident occurred before prospective jurors were brought into the courtroom. About a month after the incident became public, in September 2014, the Maryland Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, banned Nalley from the bench. The court did not state the reason, but said it had found “good cause” to take the action.